The major influence on our knowledge and views is the media. Newspapers, Books, magazines, Television, wireless and now increasingly the Internet. Who controls them is a major issue; one which the media itself chooses to largely ignore, in public at all events. The Education industry has an important part in shaping our children's' minds as well as our own. It is one we should pay attention to. Home Schooling is an answer.
If they are honest men telling it like it is then we need not worry too much. If they are rogues with different agendas they will uncover different aspects of what is going on. But if they are rogues with similar agendas there is a major problem. There are a few owners, editors and apparatchiks shaping the agenda. It might be as many as a thousand but not much more. A lot of power is concentrated in the hands of a small group. It matters.
The owner of a Newspaper
has control over it. He is subject to various forces but he can, at least
dictate the general tone of the editorial. Editors can be sacked and have been
sacked. Print unions can also have major effects although it is not normally the
content that concerns them. Newspapers can be shut down and the staff dismissed.
It has been done by Rupert Murdoch to The Times. The printers were not
amused and never did get their jobs back. The electricians
took over, leaving the printers to fume on the dole.
Samizdat - The Free Press - comes first as a salute to courage
Some of these underground newspapers amazingly achieved secret circulations of tens of thousands. Some of them were so popular that they continue in publication to the present day. Amongst current Dutch papers which originated in the wartime illegal underground press are Het Parool. (The Catchword [ The Password"? or "The Motto"? - Editor ]), Trouw (Faith), and Vrij Nederland (Free Netherlands), the last of which has a present circulation of 45,000 (slightly less than it reached during the Nazi occupation) and this month (September 2010) celebrated its 70th anniversary.
The Samizdat was the underground press in the USSR. There was also Iskra [ The Spark ] which the Bolsheviks smuggled in to Russia and caused a massive fire. Publishing then took courage. Now it just takes money and evil intent.
Who Controls Television. Who Controls America
The short answer is Jews. You doubt? Follow the evidence or, as Americans say, follow the money.
Zionist Control Of British Media
In England as in America it is Jews.
Different owners, different countries, different agendas. Truth becomes possible. Alternative explanations are certain.
Gets its entry near the beginning because it is the nearest thing to honest reportage in the English media; one that is not controlled by special interests. The only other major exception that comes to mind is the Internet which in principle is open to anyone who has a computer.
Press Censorship Is About Protecting The Powerful
Well, who would have thought it? The cynic just for a start. So will anyone who believes that if they can, they will.
Beating The Media Machine - Rolling Stone Shows The Way
The main stream media are very profitable. A large part of the cash flow comes from advertisers. Getting them to put their budget elsewhere is an effective use of a vulnerability.
Al Jazeera Versus The Bigots
Al Jazeera is a good deal more honest than the BBC and other ghastly left wing swine says Professor Balles. I am prepared to believe him.
The Big Lie
It is all Adolf's fault, isn't it? No! The Big Lie is alive and kicking to this very day. In fact there are lots of them out there.
British mass media owners
David and Frederick Barclay
Conrad Black Zionist thief, in prison for fraud.
Richard Desmond Jew, foul mouthed oaf, pornographer
Lew Grade Jew
Robert Maxwell Jew, bully, thief, traitor, murderer, oaf, presumed dead to beat the fraud raps.
Paul Reuter Jew
The Wikipedia gives six. Five of them are Jews. There are other owners. Murdoch is a Zionist even if he is not one of God's Chosen People. The Barclay brothers are Catholics.
PS It seems that Black is not a Jew even though he owned the Jerusalem Post but he is very much a Zionist.
Mr. Krusch, who is a Jew explains HOW it is done. One piece that struck home hard is How To Frame A Patriot.
CBS And Fraudulent News Reporting
CBS runs television stations. Millions watch every day. CBS lies to them systematically, deliberately. They are perverting minds.
Has always been attractive to those in power. Here is something about the realities of it.
A Conspiracy Of Silence
The media tell us what the owners want us to hear. They are liars with an agenda.
Death of the Media
The dead wood media and the main stream media are on their way down. Am I all broke up about their profit margins? Not a chance. It is the lying and perversion of the truth that get to me.
The Global Warming Guerrillas
The Internet is by passing the dead tree press and the main stream media generally. Sounds good to me.
The Guardian And Perverting The Truth
This website proves that the British political controversy of the 1990s, the so-called 'cash for questions' affair, was an invention. The evidence within these pages shows that the most influential newspaper in British society, the liberal Guardian, had dreamt up the story in a bid to oust from power the Conservative Government of Prime Minister John Major.
Two provincial journalists write, telling us that Mohamed Fayed is deeply corrupt, the Metropolitan Police ditto and the media have morals to match. It sounds right to me and makes Private Eye's coverage look timid. Backed up in c:/data 2/people
The Guardian, The Arrogance And The Agenda
In the late 1970s, when I was living in England, The Guardian was the most Soviet friendly of all British broadsheet newspapers, constantly trying to find excuses for Soviet behaviour by implying that the West was morally at least as evil as its adversaries. Apparently The Guardian has learned no lessons from the fall of Communism in 1989. Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (Who is to guard the guards themselves?)...... This is a question one may ask now that Albert Scardino, a senior editor of British left-wing newspaper The Guardian, resigned after web logger Scott Burgess revealed on The Daily Ablution that The Guardian had engaged Dilpazier Aslam, a member of Hizb ut Tahrir, an al-Qaeda related organisation, as a trainee journalist and political commentator. On 13 July, Aslam wrote an op-ed piece in The Guardian, stating that the British could not pretend “that the [7/7 London] bombings happened through no responsibility of [their] own.” Burgess’s revelation of Aslam’s membership of HuT that same 13 July was picked up by other bloggers and the mainstream media, which finally led to Aslam being sacked and the resignation of Scardino, who had known about the HuT membership of his trainee.
What possessed these people to think they could turn their paper into a platform for al-Qaeda and get away with it? The answer is arrogance. The same arrogance that characterized so many editors and journalists during the Cold War, when much of the Western press acted as a vehicle for Soviet policy. Journalists could be openly communist and that was accepted, while those who stood for freedom and democracy against the Soviets were regarded as intolerant or extreme. It was not done for the press in Western Europe to side with its own side. On the contrary, anyone who was anti-American was regarded as morally and intellectually superior. In the couple of decades since the Cold War the attitudes of the press have not changed. Their basic instinct is to side with whoever happens to be fighting against America. From worshippers of communism they have now become condoners of terrorism. To even dream of doing so in a country which has experienced terrorism first-hand throughout the war in Northern Ireland only indicates the extent of their arrogance.Antonio Gramsci, the chief theoretician of the communist party is still the dominant force in the main stream media, politics, law, you name it. Do they ever apologize for the evil they do? Not a chance. Also The Guardian And Perverting The Truth
Has the power of pictures which go direct to the subconscious mind. It is very influential. It is run by Jews, for Jews.
How To Frame A Patriot
Barry Krusch writes about HOW it is done. He is interested in the mechanics of media manipulation rather than being a sympathiser. It is in .pdf format unfortunately but well worth a read.
The Independent Television Commission
Is in the business of distorting the news, its statutory obligation notwithstanding.
Influencing The Media
Do the media influence us? They certainly do and it is big time. Can we influence them? Yes! Michael Yon explains how.
The Internet is the wild card in the media industry. It happened by accident. It is out there telling the truth and by passing the control of the oligarchs' propaganda machine. They hate it.
Is about news gathering.
Jewish Influence In The Media
Jews don't just say they control the media; they boast about it among themselves. Quotes from Jewish sources have to be taken that much more seriously.
Jewish Ownership and Control In The Media
Covers matters of fact. Ownership is like that. Influence can be much more easily hidden.
Jews Control The MediaPerhaps it is only 96% but it is a very effective stranglehold and Yes there is a reason. Our well being is not it; quite the reverse. This covers more ground than the previous piece.
Jews Incite Hatred
They pay blacks to make rap music full of foul mouthed incitement to hate. Jews are criminals on the make. Jews get away with it because they have influence with corrupt politicians.
Is more about how it is done rather than why.
Main Stream Media's Master Manipulators Are JewsQUOTE
The Mind-Benders is an analysis of the media power in Great Britain. Written in 1997, it details how (and why) the information we receive via the media is censored and distorted. If we are to avoid insidious totalitarianism we must be aware of the enormous control over every form of mass media the Jews possess and – in any democratic society under such powerful influences – who are the real manipulators of political power...........
Who are the manipulators?
But who is behind it all? Who are the people who determine what is watched on television and printed in the newspapers? This is not so easy a study because a great many of the people concerned operate in the shadows. And even in the case of those whose names are known, what is known about their backgrounds and their connections? Very little.
For this reason, very few people in Britain are aware of the huge influence over the mass media exercised by a certain ethnic minority, namely the Jews.
Students of Jewish influence in the mass media will notice a paradox: while that influence is used, in a hundred or more different ways, to weaken the national spirit and racial pride of the British people, Jews themselves, in their attitude to their Israeli homeland and to questions of Zionism generally, are to be found amongst the world's most militant nationalists. In other words, what is good for us is definitely not good for them!
Jews have their fingers in many pies all the way up to the armpits. This is another analysis of a very ugly truth.
Mass Media 101
Barry Krusch tells us in detail how the media are controlled. The owners really are the bosses. Advertisers have power too because they feed in the advertising revenue or not as the case may be. Agendas are there. But the media are businesses too.
Main Stream Media On The Skids
The news that the Sun newspaper has taken its hat off to David Cameron and the Conservative party has been met with glee by me and many others. However, exactly how much of an impact this will have on votes is not quite as certain as it was in 1997, when they famously did the same for Labour, as the Campbell diaries reveal ‘the fruit of three years hard work’.
The reason for this is the advancing role the internet plays in news reporting. Blogs, Twitter and many sites provide free, on the minute, as it happens news which many people access from the workplace, the kitchen table, or study in their own home. They no longer have to wait until the next day to pay for a newspaper to tell them news the blogs may have already been running for 20hrs......
During Easter, Guido highlighted on his blog the manner in which the Telegraph had behaved during smeargate and entirely exposed the newspapers dependence on and closeness to Damian McBride.....
You only have to look at sites like PoliticsHome , to realise that what you get free online is far superior to any thing you pay for in terms of news content. Read the Guardian Comment is free blog, or the Spectator Coffee House for high standard editorial written by journalists such as James Forsyth, to wonder just how long does the printed press have left, and who will survive?......
The world will hear. People in every country will know, the news can and will travel the globe, instantly, and most importantly it will do it for free.
An MP writes. She looks rather nice.
Media Attacks, Defending Against Them
Professor Walt wrote about the Israel lobby and got severely abused. He explains how to deal with aggravation.
Media and the CIA
The CIA ran a major operation to control and influence the media in America. Illegal? Perhaps but they did it anyway.
The Media And Israel
Israel is cast as a victim of the media. Sounds very odd to me. But the source is a good reporter, someone I believe. You have no obligation to agree. Read for yourself. See what you think.
Media and Racism
They can't be racist, can they? They keep telling us that racism is awful. It all depends who is being racist. Hating Englishmen and Americans is fine. Blacks are always victims - if you believe the media.
PS I do not.
The government lied to us about a major security nausea at London's airports. The media fed us the party line and never even hinted at the truth.
Enforcing the party line is the name of the game. John Swinton found out long ago. Nothing has changed.
The Mass Media and Mind Control Through Television
Does this sound over stated? It isn't.
The Mind Bending Power Of The Masters Of The Media
Nick Griffin, the leader of the British National Party wrote this analysis in 1997. The basic point is still sound. Jews run the media; they have an agenda. Our well being comes down the line.
Moment - A Jewish Magazine Explains
Here are some quotes from a magazine for Jews called "Moment". It is subtitled "The Jewish magazine for the 90's" These quotes are from the Aug 1996 edition after the Headline "Jews Run Hollywood - So What?": "It makes no sense at all to try to deny the reality of Jewish power and prominence in popular culture. Any list of the most influential production executives at each of the major movie studios will produce a heavy majority of recognizably Jewish names."
"Furthermore, even those newspapers still under Gentile ownership and management are so thoroughly dependent upon Jewish advertising..."
"The New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington Post. These three...are the newspapers which set trends and guidelines for nearly all others. They are the ones which decide what is news and what isn't, at national and international levels. They originate the news; the others merely copy it. And all three newspapers are in Jewish hands...The Sulzberger family also owns, through the New York Times Co. 36 other newspapers; twelve magazines, including McCall's and Family Circle..."
"New York's other newspapers are in no better hands than the Daily News. The New York Post is owned by billionaire Jewish real-estate developer Peter Kalikow. The Village Voice is the personal property of Leonard Stern. Source:- http://jewwatch.com/jew-controlledpress-folder.html
Net neutrality on the Internet sounds obscure. It is but its enemies have an agenda. They want to rob us blind. News this is not. It is worth knowing what is going on here.
Newspapers Are Dying
They were profitable, influential then the wireless became an option. Television was another news channel. The Internet was the real option, one that made publishing cheap, easy worthwhile. Paper is no longer the only way.
Our View of Atrocities Depends Entirely on the Media
That is a slight overstatement but very much on the right lines.
There are no more than a dozen nationals in England with rather fewer owners and editorial policies. They had power as propaganda tools for shaping people's opinions but now the Internet is giving us something that they do not which is the truth. There are also lies and rubbish but you have some chance of sorting one from the other.
After the World exposed an illegal payment of $40 million by the United States to the French Panama Canal Company in 1909, Pulitzer was indicted for libeling Theodore Roosevelt and J. P. Morgan. The courts dismissed the indictments.
In 1892, Pulitzer offered Columbia University's president, Seth Low, money to set up the world's first school of journalism. The university initially turned down the money, evidently turned off by Pulitzer's unscrupulous character.
Teddy Roosevelt was a very big man. Morgan was a big time manipulator. The Wiki implies that they were guilty as charged. Wall Street did not hesitate to finance the Bolshevik Revolution for personal gain. The dirt on Pulitzer, a Jew of course is elusive.
Richard Littlejohn, a journo tells it like it is
Unpredictable and high profile, Richard Littlejohn is the left's favourite hate figure.
Being hated by the left is a minimum condition of honesty.
He looks quite reasonable.
Rupe is enormous in media, having power and abusing power is the name of the game. Here is another view of the issue:-
Who Rules America?
The Alien Grip on Our News and Entertainment Media Must Be Broken
This sounds rather paranoid. Can it possibly be true? Follow the evidence and the answer is; Yes, it can be true. Yes, it is true.
Russia Israel and Media Omission
Jews took over Russia by controlling Boris Yeltsin, robbed Her blind then made off to Israel or other countries they control. Were we told? No! They control the media. They control what we know.
Are very much part of the main stream media, seen by many millions and deadly effective as a result. The average man or especially woman does not see them as vehicles for promoting Marxism. They are none the less propaganda vehicles, sugar coated and cunningly used.
The Internet is free, isn't it? Yes, more or less but there are powerful politicians and businessmen with agendas and controlling it is a big objective. The freedom it gave was granted by accident. The ability to tell the truth was definitely not what governments want. The Wikipedia is one part that has been created to follow the agenda of one man. It is like those newspapers - controlled by men with the same passports - Israeli passports that is. See Control of internet information
Pondering The Telescreen
You thought that television was bad? It is worse. Fred explains in his usual cheerful style. He is a better writer than me so he makes the point better albeit he does not tell us who controls the rubbish or why.
What does Hollyork promote? Toleration of foul language and a concomitant coarsening of society; hostility between men and women; truculent illiteracy and the values of the black ghetto; the elevation of homosexuality and promiscuity; disdain for religion; use of drugs, interracial sex, destructive feminism, eradication of the remnants of Anglo-European Christian civilization. It is not accidental.
Sells itself as the online encyclopaedia that anyone can edit. The truth is rather different.
The Wikipedia and Propaganda
Why tell the truth when you can lie? The Wiki's claims about Jewish involvement in the Bolshevik Revolution are compared with Robert Wilton's. He was reporting for The Times and was there on the day.
Wikipedia and Vandalism
Yes, they do get vandals changing pages. Yes they have to do something about it. No they do not have to be politically biased.
Between the wars Claud Cockburn realized that the newspapers of the day were feeding the public a very bland version of reality, the reality that was the common currency of diplomats, journos and even politicians. His insight led him to publish The Week which was fun, subversive and, in practice, impossible to sue. A libel action can take your money but if you have none, you are much safer. The Week has gone but now we have a new irritant for those who dislike the truth.
This new wild card is the Internet. Designed by DARPA for military communications, it has given ordinary people the ability to communicate worldwide. It is fair to say that a lot of their communication is third rate or worse but some is better. Telling the gold from the dross is not too difficult. The real payoff is that it bypasses the media moguls and governments. That is why we must be deeply suspicious of anyone who is selling us the solution to problems on the Net. Pornography is not pleasant. We hear the stories. Some of them might even be true. Yes; Spam is a problem. Certainly we could all do without it but offers to control the Net and prevent it are offers to control our lives; offers to give governments the power that they all seem to like far too much. If the choice on offer is Spam or government, I will settle for Spam.
ABC's culture of contempt
The Australian Broadcasting Commission is an arm's length management organisation [ ALMO ] with its own left wing agenda and an enthusiasm for denying it. Notice the names of the guilty, or should I say, the accused? The agenda is exactly the same as that of the BBC, inciting communism and homosexuality plus other trendy nastiness.
AIPAC: Still Spying, Still Tax-Exempt
How many espionage operations get tax exemption? Not too many is the answer especially if they happen to be known as spies. But if they also have political influence and media control it becomes that much easier. That is how AIPAC does it.
The Beeb is known, respected, trusted et cetera. That is what they want us to believe but not everyone thinks they are perfect. Some of us think they have abused their position very cleverly. They have been at the forefront when it comes to inciting homosexuality. They have a motive for that. Their Alexa rating is 10 which means nine sites get more traffic. See BBC Online
BBC 'wanted to sack Humphrys' [ 6 October 2005 ]
Green and Thompson wanted to sack John Humphrys after he told the truth and was betrayed by a Labour spy. Sacking would have proved that they were toeing the government line. They bottled out when it when public.
Bias: A CBS Insider Exposes How the Media Distort the News
by Bernard Goldberg. He was an insider then it all went wrong. More at Media Distortion
BURYING THE LANCET - PART 1
The Lancet told us that that 100,000 had been killed in Iraq. The media and politicians claimed that they were incompetent and wrong or just plain wrong. The media are liars with an agenda. So are the politicians of course. Here is a longish factual analysis.
BURYING THE LANCET - PART 2
Count deaths in the Congo and count deaths in Iraq. Get accepted without question for the Congo while getting called incompetents over Iraq. This is from men who are deeply ignorant of maths except for the purposes of expense claims and tax fraud.
BURYING THE LANCET - Update
Various people with various degrees of expertise respond. We are invited to tell various journos and reptiles that they are ignorant patter merchants.
In 1996, the Britannica was bought from the Benton Foundation by Jacqui Safra at well below its estimated value, owing to the company's financial difficulties. The Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. company split in 1999. One part retained the company name and developed the print version, and the other part, Britannica.com Inc., developed the digital versions.....
Is owned by a Jew, Jacqui Safra since 1996. It was bought in 1920 by Julius Rosenwald through Sears Roebuck.
Facebook is a social networking website that allows people to communicate with their friends and exchange information. Launched on February 4, 2004, Facebook was founded by [ a Jew ], Mark Zuckerberg, a former member of the Harvard class of 2006.
The Wikipedia fingers Mark Zuckerberg, a Jew, Dustin Moskovitz, also a Jew and Andrew McCollum who doesn't get an entry and doesn't sound at all like a Jew.
Google is owned by Google, Inc. whose mission statement is to "organize the world's information and make it universally accessible and useful". The largest search engine on the web, Google receives several hundred million queries each day through its various services.
It was set up by a Jew, Sergey Brin, and a Jew who needs a shave, Larry Page. It now owned by Google Inc. and has over 15,000 employees.
Some newspapers tell some of the truth some of the time. Haaretz is honest - some times. It is the publicly respectable face of Israel. It is widely read and on the Internet. It tells us things that Jewish politicians would prefer us not to know but there are significant differences between the English version and the Hebrew version which is for home consumption only. Then there is their own search engine which hides things from me, others too I suspect.
Horrific Media Spikes
This offering from Ted Lang popped up somewhere else entitled Jews Spike the News. That is a fair title. He tells us about the Jew who left the Department of Defence with the benefit of a news black out after a US$1 trillion went missing. Yes, a trillion, which is to say a thousand billion. Even in a world inured to politicians wasting billions rather than mere millions, a trillion is a LOT of money to defraud, steal, lose, find, give to your little mates or what ever.
Lord Northcliffe and The Times
Lord Northcliffe was a very successful newspaper owner and founded The Daily Mail among others. His fall from power was due to foul play and has an important lesson for us. He upset Zionists and his editor Wickham Steed had him locked up as a lunatic. It was simple, brutal and very effective. So was the news blackout that followed it. The National Vanguard tells us in some detail. The Wikipedia tells us that he died under suspicious circumstances but no more. The Zionist Conspiracy against Publishing the Protocols is much more forthcoming.
Louis Farrakhan and the Media
When a man gets a dreadful press it just might be that he deserves better. There is a case for the Honourable Minister Louis Farrakhan which is a case against the media and its owners.
Journalistic Fraud [ 27 July 2010 ]
Propaganda is associated in the popular mind with totalitarian regimes............. In fact, the advent of the information age has made propaganda much more pervasive than it ever was in any of those societies. What is more, despite the constant development of ever more subtle applications of propaganda techniques, modern manifestations in the ‘free’ mainstream Western media can be just as crude as the worst examples ever to appear under the yoke of Eastern Communism........
Case in point is Michael Sheridan’s recent article in the New York Daily News,..... And the 16-word title alone deploys no less than 10 of such techniques (ad hominem, name-calling, stereotyping, demonizing the enemy, lying, appeal to fear, appeal to prejudice, labelling, and thought-terminating cliché), some of which are later redeployed in the main text. If you consider that out of the 16 words 8 are names, that means that there is more propaganda in the title than there are actual words.
Journalism is fraud. Fraud is journalism. It is not quite that simple really but it can be. Some newspapers tell some of the truth some of the time. That is nearer to reality. Pictures are very effective because they got straight to the subconscious whereas reading slows us down a bit, making us use the conscious part of our brain.
Leading Journalists Expose Major Cover-ups by Media Corporations
Systematic lying tells me that there is an agenda [ or more ]. Journos write about the cover ups that were forced onto them. They found out about the power in the press as distinct from the power of the press. Systematic, deliberate, wide ranging lies are propagated by the press. People have decided to talk. See what the insiders have to say at:- http://www.wanttoknow.info/mediacover-up
The New York Times Is Run By Jews For Jews [ 26 February 2010 ]QUOTE
Do You Have to be Jewish to Report on Israel for the New York Times?
A recent assignment of mine covering Israel’s presumed links to the assassination of Hamas leader Mahmoud al-Mabhouh provoked some more thoughts about the New York Times reporter Ethan Bronner. He is the Jerusalem bureau chief who has been at the centre of a controversy since it was revealed last month that his son is serving in the Israeli army. Despite mounting pressure to replace Bronner, the NYT’s editors have so far refused to consider that he might be facing a conflict of interest or that it would be wiser to post him elsewhere..... A more interesting question than whether Bronner is now facing a conflict of interest over his son serving in the Israeli army is whether the NYT reporter was facing such a conflict long before the latest revelations surfaced. Could it be that it is actually incumbent on Bronner, as the NYT’s bureau chief, to have such a conflict of interest? [ Hint: Yes! - Editor ]
Jonathan Cook is an Englishman in the business. Living in Bethlehem means that he knows the Palestinians. Does this mean that the NY Times is different from the rest? No, not in the main.
Pysops = Psychological Operations
"To this end," Vallely and co-author continued, "MindWar must be strategic in emphasis,............In its strategic context, MindWar must reach out to friends, enemies, and neutrals alike across the globe—neither through primitive 'battlefield' leaflets and loudspeakers of PSYOP nor through the weak, imprecise, and narrow effort of psychotronics—but through the media possessed by the United States which have the capabilities to reach virtually all people on the face of the Earth. These media are, of course the electronic media—television and radio. State of the art developments in satellite communication, video recording techniques, and laser and optical transmission of broadcasts make possible a penetration of the minds of the world such as would have been inconceivable just a few years ago. Like the sword Excalibur [King Arthur's magical sword—ed.], we have but to reach out and seize this tool; and it can transform the world for us if we have the courage and the integrity to enhance civilization with it. If we do not accept Excalibur, then we relinquish our ability to inspire foreign cultures with our morality. If they can then desire moralities unsatisfactory to us, we have no choice but to fight them on a more brutish level."
The media are a weapon of war although I doubt that these twerps have what it takes to use it. They already are being used in the culture war being waged by Hollywood, the BBC and the rest of the alphabet soup that feed our children's minds.
Walter Durante reported from Russia under Stalin, claimed that there was no famine in the Ukraine and lied in his teeth. The New York Times suspected that he was lying and ran the stories anyway.
Racism and the Media
The media are very big on racism and blaming Englishmen. The reality is not quite the same.
Tim Montgomery and Media Corruption
He was black when he was the world champion. Then his colour was deemphasized when he came unstuck for drugs and fraud.
Top 25 Censored news stories of 2007
The truth comes down the line.
'We Don't Own the News Any More' [ 6 October 2005 ]
'We' don't control it totally either and even if 'we' did 'we' are not trusted any more. We [ real people as distinct from 'we', the media ] have got our own news channels now. We can broadcast over the Internet. 'We' don't like it. 'We' have not got total control any more. Notice that the BBC acts as an arm of the police state, carrying out espionage operations against political dissidents [ of the right, but never the left ] and having them prosecuted - maliciously of course.
Any one who tells us that the Internet should be controlled should be regarded with grave suspicion. They will have the standard excuses; child pornography, identity theft and so on. The media is still immensely powerful. It is not as crude as the propaganda machine in the USSR. Subtlety makes it far more effective.
Who Runs the Media? The Full Story
Someone else has taken the point that the media are controlled by Jews, which in practice means Zionists. He gives us sources. They are checkable.
.. is a video sharing website where users can upload, view and share video clips. YouTube was created in mid-February 2005 by three former PayPal employees.
Founded by a Bengali, Jawed Karim born in Eastern Germany, an American, Chad Hurley and a Chinaman, Steve Chen
If you feel disposed to tell the media what you think about the drivel that they produce you can contact some of them through this link.
Errors & omissions,
broken links, cock ups, over-emphasis, malice [ real or imaginary ] or
whatever; if you find any I am open to comment.
Email me at
Mike Emery. All financial contributions are cheerfully accepted. If you want to keep it private, use my PGP Key. Home Page
Updated on Saturday, 09 November 2013 20:26:32