Libel is what Jews call the
charge that they murder Christian children for their blood. After they have got
the blood they use it for making medicine or magic. The investigation
and publication by Professor Toaff, a Jew caused major irritation
among God's Chosen People because he told us that St.
Simon of Trent was tortured and murdered for his blood. He
leaned on big time and recanted somewhat.
That is the story in this little article with an odd title. Cats
are more intelligent than Catholics It also tells us
that this was not a one off but very much part of a pattern.
PS Something of same sort happened in the Ukraine in 1912 - The 'Killer of Kiev' Mendel Beilis was fingered.
What Christians know is that Jesus Christ was crucified. At Mass the priest turns bread and wine into His flesh and blood which is then consumed by the priest and parishioners. It is ritual cannibalism for believers. Then we are supposed to believe that Jews would not do something of the sort in the Middle Ages. Given their track record of murdering children in modern times in Palestine for laughs it seems all too likely. Here is one - 'I can't imagine anyone who considers himself a human being can do this'. The journo, Chris McGreal may well have been upset when he wrote that head line.
Blood Libel Plus
What is more extreme than murdering Christian children for their blood? Murdering their own. Did it happen? A Jew says the evidence is incontrovertible.
Jewish Ritual Murder
It still happens from time to time. At all events someone in Russia seems to think so. Is he wrong. Quite possibly not.
Jewish Ritual Murder - An Investigation
Was written by Hellmut Schramm, Ph.D. Here it is translated from German. If the site is not available try Jewish Ritual Murder - An Investigation As he points out human sacrifice is very much part of the Bible. Animals were used too from time to time. The Jewish word for people is goyim which means cattle. They of course claim that they are God's Chosen People and superior to us cattle. The Wiki also mentions:-
Little Saint Hugh of Lincoln, 1255.
William of Norwich
Werner of Oberwesel
The Infamous Damascus Blood Libel
It was part of the fun in Arab countries too.
St. Simon of Trent
THE TORTURE AND DEATH OF SAINT SIMON OF TRENT
The small Simon, a little boy from Trent, was slayed [ sic ] on the 21st March, 1475 A.D., on Maundy Thursday during Holy Week.
The case was prosecuted by Bishop Hinderbach, and the Jews were sentenced to death. Immediately, all Jews of the area protested the sentence and succeeded in gaining a new trial for the accused. It was tried before Giudici of Ventimiglia, and he confirmed the sentence. Again because of Jewish protests, the case came before the court of Pope Sixtus IV. He commissioned the greatest and most famous professor of law at that time, Panvino, to serve as Chief Justice. Assisted by six cardinals, he too confirmed the sentence.......
The *records of this trial...... were disclosed by Pope Benedict XIV. Also Pope Clement XIV... verified the murders of both St. Simon of Trent and St. Andreas of Rinn... as cases of ritual murder almost 300 years later, in 1770. The boy [Simon] who was tortured to death at Trent was officially canonized by Pope Sixtus V. The Holy Infant Martyr, St. Simon of Trent's feast day is always celebrated on March 24th.
........ In 1965 A.D., the cult was sacrilegiously attempted to be "suppressed" (which is an impossibility) by order of the Racist Zionist Mafia in collaboration with their Marrano friends in the VATICAN [ The Pope was. This attack on St. Simon of Trent's sacred cult, by the Modernist infiltrators holed up in Rome, was/is in perfect harmony with their overall attempt [PLAN] to abandon TRADITION [THE FAITH] "in favor" of [i.e. WITH] modern Judaism.
(Note: This is further proof, as if we need more, that the Vatican II sect is not the True Catholic Church, but instead is a counterfeit church, headed by imposters who have usurped Church property. -The Webmaster - stsimonoftrent.com)
The Catholic Boy, St. Christopher, was Killed by Jewish Ritual Murder on Oct 17, 1490 A.D., at La Guardian, (near Toledo) Spain......
.... this case of Ritual Murder was "one of the chief factors, if not the decisive one, in the decision of Fernando and Isabel" (for the expulsion of the Jews from Spain)...... The murdered boy was canonized as St. Christopher on the authority of His Holiness, Pope Pius VII.
That is the basic story. The fact is that the murderers got three trials and were found guilty every time. Making Simon a Saint means that a later Pope agreed. There is no doubt that the author of this piece agrees passionately. and that the modern Church has changed its position drastically. It is sensible to ask why the management has overturned centuries of doctrine in favour of the Jews. People do ask whether the Pope is a Catholic. The answer is not always in the affirmative. Some ask if he is a Jew. It is far from being impossible. Antonio Gramsci, the chief theoretician of the communist party in Italy designed his system to infiltrate Holy Mother Church because he saw it as the main obstacle to communism.
St. William of Norwich
Born 1132; died 22 March, 1144. On Holy Saturday, 25 March, 1144, a boy's corpse showing signs of a violent death was found in Thorpe Wood near Norwich. It was not touched until Easter Monday, where it was buried ceremony where it lay. In the meantime a number of young men and boys had visited the spot and the Jews were suspected of the murder on account of the nature of the wounds.
In the "Jewish Encyclopedia", III, 266, may be found a list of the cases of this ritual murder , beginning with William of Norwich. There are 5 other cases given for the twelfth century, 15 for the thirteenth, 10 for the fourteenth, 16 for the fifteenth, 13 for the sixteenth, 8 for the seventeenth, 15 for the eighteenth, and 39 for the nineteenth, going right up to the year 1900. There have been more recent cases still in Eastern Europe. Ritual murder as a Jewish institution has been learnedly and conclusively disproved, e.g. by Strack, op. cit. below, and in the case of St. William the evidence is totally insufficient.
The Catholic Encyclopedia is not keen on the story and says that the evidence is wanting. The Wikipedia, manages to sound fair. It talks about motives. It doesn't of course tell us why Jews were hated. The Jewish Encyclopaedia is dismissive. It gives further details which might or might not be genuine.
Blood Accusation .
Is a Jewish source and gives us a listing of the murders. There are several from 1144 AD to 1900 AD.
Ariel Toaff - Wikipedia, the free encyclopaedia
According to press reports, Toaff claims in his book that some Christian children may have been killed by "a minority of fundamentalist Jews of Ashkenazi origin." In an interview with Haaretz Toaff said: "Over many dozens of pages I proved the centrality of blood on Passover," Toaff said. "Based on many sermons, I concluded that blood was used, especially by Ashkenazi Jews, and that there was a belief in the special curative powers of children's blood. It turns out that among the remedies of Ashkenazi Jews were powders made of blood.".........
Twelve of Italy's chief rabbis in a press release refuting Toaff's claims declared: "It is totally inappropriate to utilize declarations extorted under torture centuries ago to reconstruct bizarre and devious historical theses."
The Wiki manages to sound more or less fair but the agenda is there none the less. Jews still use torture of course. No problem there; not for Jews only the victims.
Jews And Devil Worship
Jews look reasonable from the outside and worship the Devil in secret. This sounds fairly way out. Is it true? A Jew says yes and that she was part of it, as a victim. True or false? Pass but it fits in nicely with their human sacrifice, which they deny very loudly in public. That is what they call the Blood Libel. Read for yourself. Think for yourself. Decide for yourself.
Cats are more intelligent that Catholics
Two Nations In Thy Womb
Israel Shamir explains the background and the feel of this murder.
Good Catholic children shared some fundamental certainties.
The Church was divided into the shepherds and the flock. The shepherds were devoting their lives to the flock. The shepherds were trying to protect the flock from harm. We believed that they could tell the difference between wolves and rabbits.
We believed in saints. We believed the Church had method of identifying saints.
We believed the shepherds were on our side.
Once upon a time there was a St. Simon of Trent.
The story of St. Simon of Trent went like this. Some Jews celebrated the Passover of 1475 by kidnapping a two-year old Catholic boy in the Italian town of Trentino. They drained his blood and crucified him head down. The killers were arrested, confessed and convicted. Italian Jews protested the verdict. Pope Sixtus IV appointed a commission of six cardinals for a retrial. The verdict of guilty was upheld. The records of this retrial are still available in the Vatican.
For centuries Jews have called the charge that some Jews murdered Christians to use their blood in Jewish religious rituals “the blood libel.”
In 1965, the Roman Catholic bishops wanted to be loved by the Jewish media. The Bishop of Trent signed a decree proclaiming that the blood libel against the Jews of that city was unfounded. The cult of St. Simon was abolished. The alleged martyr’s body was removed and hidden away to stop pilgrims from visiting the grave.
Recently, Ariel Toaff, Professor of Medieval and Renaissance History at Bar-Ilan University in Israel, published BLOOD PASSOVER: European Jews and Ritual Murder.
The Jerusalem Post (February 7, 2007) reported on the scandal. Professor Toaff had found that from 1100 to about 1500 several crucifixions of Christian children happened and that Jewish merchant were running a market in human blood at the time for medical use “with rabbinic certification of the product - kosher blood.”
Jewish organization swarmed into action. Professor Toaff was forced to destroy his book and repent. You can find an English translation as a free .pdf download on the web.
When Toaff examined the trial records of the murderers of the former St. Simon of Trent he was staggered. The confessions of the murderers contained details of the crime that only the killers could know.
Toaff discovered many cases of such bloody sacrifices connected with the mutilation of children, outpouring of blood and its baking into Matzo (unleavened bread) spanning five hundred years of European history.
Toaff reports the existence a market for bloody matzo. The most costly of which was made with the blood of a Christian child. The blood had to be of a boy younger than seven years old.) Some Jews did kidnap Christian children. Some Jews did murder Christian children. Some Jews did use the blood of Christian children in rituals. The “Blood Libel” is not a libel, it is the truth.
Israeli professor Israel Yuval has explained that blood was a necessary ingredient for medieval Jewish magicians who wanted call down divine vengeance on non-Jews.
Two Nations in Thy Womb
Elliott Horowitz reports that some Jews whipped statues of the Virgin Mary, destroyed crucifixes, and even murdered Christians to celebrate Purim. (Reckless Rites: Purim and the Legacy of Jewish Violence.
For a thousand years the Catholics in Orvieto, Italy, commemorated the miracle of Trani. A Jewish woman stole a consecrated host from a church and tried to fry it. Blood flowed from the host and filled her house and she was discovered. The Roman Association of Friends of Israel demanded the abolition of the traditional procession. They got it and an apology from the Vatican. The Vatican ignored that Yuval and Horowitz, and now Toaff, have attested to host desecrations by Jews
Although little Simon of Trent was still a saint when I began my lessons in Catholicism, his murder was never mentioned. When I finished my instruction in Catholic history and theology, the murdered boy was no longer a saint. Many other things were never mentioned. The history of the Jews in Christendom since the completion of the New Testament until Vatican Two was never mentioned by any nun, priest, brother, or professor of theology. None of them mentioned the Talmud.
Pope Pius XI’s condemnation of the Nazi persecution of the Jews was mentioned with pride and Pope Pius XII was defended from the charge that he did not do enough to rescue Jews. Pope John XXII was praised for his efforts to save Jews when he was a papal diplomat.
This has come to look odd now that the internet has made it possible to learn the history the Vatican had to know but did not teach.
In the year 1236, Nicholas Donin, a Jewish convert to Christianity, approached Pope Gregory IX with a list of serious charges about the Jewish religion He told the Pope that the rabbis taught the Jews to kill Christians. Donin told the Pope the Talmud taught the Jews that they could cheat and deceive Christians whenever possible. He told the Pope that daily prayers of the Jews cursed the Christians.
The Pope ordered an investigation. The Talmud was examined by scholars. Donin’s charges were confirmed. The Pope ordered the Talmud to be burned.
Many other Jews who converted to Christianity told the Church authorities about the contents of the Talmud and ritualized hatred of non-Jews.
Pablo Christiani, a convert who had studied the Talmud under the guidance of famous rabbis went to the Church authorities in Barcelona in 1262.
Peter Schwartz, Hans Boyd, and Paul de Santa-Maria [formerly Solomon Levi] were Jewish converts who warned the Church authorities about the Talmud in the 14th century.
In 1700, the Austrian Christian, Johann Eisenmenger, wrote Judaism Uncovered. He was well acquainted with the Talmud. He was a respected scholar who read Hebrew, Aramaic and Arabic. Eisenmenger wrote that the Jewish religious tradition forbids robbery, deceit, and even murder only within the Jewish community. Non-Jews were exempt from moral protection. He argued that people raised with such beliefs would be inclined to defame Christianity, as well as rob, swindle and even murder Christians.
The most famous Jewish commentator on the Talmud is Moses Maimonides. The private Jewish school that Noah Feldman attended was name after Maimonides. His writings are authoritative among the Orthodox Jews around the world. His words are part of the standard Orthodox Jewish religious services today. The Catholic Church could not have been ignorant in his case.
What did Maimonides say the Talmud teaches about the value of non-Jewish lives?
“Accordingly, if we see an idolater [non-Jew] being swept away or drowning in the river, we should not help him. If we see that his life is in danger, we should not save him.”
“And this applies not to corpse uncleanness only but to any other kind of uncleanness: neither gentiles nor cattle are susceptible to any uncleanness.”
“‘If a man schemes against his fellow man and kills the man deliberately, take him away from the altar and put him to death. But a gentile is not considered a man, and even more so, a Jew is not executed for killing an unrighteous gentile.” - Maimonides, Mishnah Torah, Brooklyn, New York, 1990.
St. Justin Martyr stated in 116 A. D.: “The Jews were behind all the persecutions of the Christians. They wandered through the country everywhere hating and undermining the Christian faith.”
Professor Toaff mentions that the celebrations of Jewish feast of Purim sometime included the murder of Christian child. He cites the 5th century history by Socrates Scholasticus. In 415AD the Jews living near Antioch took a Christian child and tied him to a cross and killed him.
Mohammed mentions the extermination of the Arabian Christians by a Jewish army from Yemen in the Koran. Jewish web sites describe its perpetrators as heroes.
Jews bought Christian prisoners of war from the Persians purely for the pleasure of torturing and killing them. The mass graves of the murdered Christians were recently discovered in Jerusalem. The Israelis bulldozed them.
Toaff also cites the crucifixion of a Christian during the Purim Festival of 1191 or 1192 AD by the Jews of Brie in France. King Philippe August tried the entire adult Jewish population of Brie and they were burned at the stake for their crime.
What can we learn from Professor Toaff about the Jews in Europe at the time little Simon was murdered.
Jewish moneylender and bankers were active throughout Christendom. They lent money at 40% interest to non-Jews.
Jews used their money power to bribe civil and church authorities.
Jews were frequently involved in fraudulent bankruptcies and swindles.
Jews resorted to poisoning and assassination.
Jews, especially the Ashkenazi Jews like the ones who murdered Simon were obsessed with hatred for the Christian religion and for Christians.
Jewish slave traders were permitted to transport Christian slaves across Europe and sell them to the Moslems.
Jewish slave traders kidnapped and castrated Christian boys and sold them to the Moslems.
Jews used human blood in all sorts of quack remedies, despite the Biblical prohibition, even for minor complaints.
Jewish merchants sold rabbincally certified Christian blood for religious rituals.
Jews used Christian human blood in their matzoh balls at Passover.
Jews used Christian human blood in their wine at Passover.
The blood had to be from Christian boys no more than 7 years old.
Some Christians tried to sell the blood of Christian boys to Jews, but Jews refused to buy from them because they suspected the Christians of trying pawn off animal blood as the real thing.
Professor Toaff now claims that he was wrong and that Christian boys were never murdered. The blood only came from voluntary donors. I guess he never read his book.
The Catholic Church has always had the information revealed in Professor Tuaff’s book. He found most of his information in the interrogations, witness statements, and trial records that still exist in the archives of the Catholic Church.
Jews often attack the Catholic Church as the source of anti-Semitism.
Professor Tuaff’s book shows a Church that consistently tried to deflect hostility towards the Jews.
Two hundred and ninety years after the murder of Simon of Trent, Cardinal Lorenzo Ganganelli, later Pope Clement XIV, was put in charge of investigating accusation of Jewish ritual infanticide by the Congregation of the Holy Office, the Inquisition.
On 19 January 1760, he reported:
“I therefore admit as true the fact of the sainted Simon, the boy of three years of age killed by Jews in hatred of the faith of Jesus Christ in Trent in the year 1475 [...] I accept as true another crime, committed in the village of Rinn, diocese of Bressanone, in 1462, against the sainted Andrea, a boy barbarously killed by the Jews in hatred of the faith of Jesus Christ [...] I do not, however, believe, even admitting as true the true facts of Bressanone and Trent, that one can justifiably deduce that this is a maxim, either theoretical or practical, of the Hebrew nation, since two events alone are insufficient to establish a certain and common axiom.”
I guess Cardinal Ganganelli could not find the archives.
Posted by Robert Reis on Tuesday, September 18, 2007 at 09:42 AM in Jewish Diaspora
Comments (3) | Tell-a-Friend
No trackbacks yet.
Page 1 of 1 pages
Great article, Robert. That’s probably one of the best I have read here so far. Should be interesting to see what Von has to say about it.
Posted by Scimitar on Tuesday, September 18, 2007 at 05:48 PM | #
I agree that was a very good log entry.
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Tuesday, September 18, 2007 at 07:51 PM | #
...In the beginning of the attack, he tried to brave it: “I will not give up my devotion to the truth and academic freedom even if the world crucifies me.” Toaff told Haaretz earlier this week that he stood by the contention of his book, that there is a factual basis for some of the medieval blood accusations against the Jews.
But Toaff was not made of stern stuff. Like Winston Smith, the main character of Orwell’s 1984, he broke down in a mental cellar of Jewish inquisition. He published a full apology, stopped distribution of his book, promised to submit it to Jewish censorship, and “also promised to donate all the funds forthcoming from the sale of his book to the Anti-Defamation League” of good Abe Foxman.
His last words were as touching as those of Galileo recanting his heresy: “I will never allow any Jew-hater to use me or my research as an instrument for fanning the flames, once again, of the hatred that led to the murder of millions of Jews. I extend my sincerest apologies to all those who were offended by the articles and twisted facts that were attributed to me and to my book.”
Blood Passover by Professor Toaff
Prof. Toaff has since partially recanted, and now maintains that:
- yes, Jews are a corrupting and disruptive element in society;
- yes, Jews lend money at 40% and seem to do little else;
- yes, Jews buy and sell justice with huge bribes;
- yes, Jews pull off all sorts of fraudulent bankruptcies and swindles;
- yes, Jews resort to poisoning and assassination when thwarted;
- yes, Jews are obsessed with hatred for Christians and the Christian religion;
- yes, Jews kidnapped and castrated Christian boys on a large scale and sold them into slavery in Islamic Spain for centuries;
- yes, Jews used [and still use?] human blood in all sorts of quack remedies, despite the Biblical prohibition, even for minor complaints;
- yes, Jews [and still use?] Christian human blood in their matzoh balls at Passover;
- yes, Jews [and still use?] Christian human blood in their wine at Passover;
- yes, the blood had to be from Christian boys no more than 7 years of age;
- yes, the blood had [has?] to be certified kosher by a rabbi;
- yes, there was [is?] a large and profitable trade in fake blood products and animal blood, which was [are?] unsuitable to the purpose;
- yes, Christians tried to sell the blood of Christian boys to Jews, but were rejected because the Jews feared it was animal blood; but no, no Christian boys were ever killed to obtain the blood. Never, never! Or hardly ever. It all came from “voluntary donors”!
Anybody having read the book will simply laugh
The only “saving clause” is that these charges are made against Ashkenazi Jews only. It would be interesting to see how much filthy “Sephardic linen’ the Ashkenazi could air in public if they so chose.
That is a damning indictment from a Jewish historian even it was only Ashkenazi Jews.
Errors & omissions, broken links,
cock ups, over-emphasis, malice [ real or imaginary ] or whatever; if
you find any I am open to comment.
Email me at Mike Emery. All financial contributions are cheerfully accepted. If you want to keep it private, use my PGP Key. Home Page
Updated on 24/03/2013 20:17