Amnesty is another of those pressure groups and an effective one. That is why it is important and that in its turn is why it was infiltrated by subversives. If it were honest and effective that would be fine. The reality is that they are very much like AIPAC and other outfits, open to infiltration by Jews. And they have been. Professor Boyle has been there and knows what he is talking about. It was founded by a Jew and communist, one Peter Benenson It is very selective about which human rights abuses matter.
Amnesty
International
The Metapedia explains that it was founded by a Jew and communist. It objects to
free speech.
QUOTE
Amnesty International (AI) is an international
non-governmental organization (NGO) that claims to promote
human rights by supporting campaigns to free all
prisoners of conscience; ensure fair and prompt trials for
political prisoners; abolish the
death penalty,
torture,
and other cruel treatment of prisoners; end political killings and forced
"disappearances"; and oppose all human rights abuses, whether by governments
or by opposition groups.
Founded in the United Kingdom in 1961, AI draws attention to human rights abuses and campaigns for compliance with international standards. It works to mobilize public opinion which exerts pressure on those who perpetrate abuses.
It was founded by Peter Benenson, a Jewish communist sympathizer who later converted to Roman Catholicism.
Opposition to Freedom of Speech
Amnesty International has often stated that the so called "hate speech" (by which they intend any criticism of races other than white, homosexuals and so on) should be persecuted. In fact "hate speech" is what is now seen by liberals as a form of opposition to their politics of mass immigration. Amnesty International seems so to support the mainstream policy of don't let them speak against political opposition.
Amnesty International Likes Male Genital
Mutilation Because It is Controlled By Jews
Amnesty International Is Controlled By Zionist
Crazies [ 17 May
2008 ]
QUOTE
Insider describes Zionist control of Amnesty
International - Francis Anthony Boyle is a professor of
international law at the University of Illinois College of Law.
The Israel lobby uses
bribes and
threats to control Amnesty-USA. And, since Amnesty-USA pays about 20%
of the budget for Amnesty-England, the Israeli lobby controls London
too...........
I got involved in Amnesty in 1982 while the Israelis were invading Lebanon. Twenty thousand Lebanese people were being exterminated, but Amnesty-USA refused to do anything, because of its pro-Israel bias. In fact, the only organization that protested the Israelis was the American Friends Service Committee.........
In April 2002, Israelis massacred 60 Palestinians in Jenin. The United Nations tried to investigate, but both Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch said there had been no massacre. This allowed Bush and Ariel Sharon to prevent any investigation.........
Amnesty also refused to investigate the Sabra and Shatila massacres in Lebanon. Philip Habib (then U.S. Envoy to the Middle East) personally promised Arafat that if the PLO fighters abandoned the camps, then the U.S. would guarantee the protection of Palestinians. When the killing began, the U.S. embassy knew about it, but did nothing for 48 hours so the Phalangists, working for the Israelis, could complete their massacre. The USA had a CIA agent at Sabra and Shatila – I’m not sure who it was. Anyway the USA knew the massacre was happening, and allowed it to continue. Then Amnesty said there had been no massacre.
UNQUOTE
Political manipulation is where Jews really come into their own. They ran the Bolshevik Revolution and murdered millions. The control Bush and set the American army on Iraq. It goes on. This is just another example. Source Amnesty On Jenin
Amnesty And Corruption
QUOTE
Francis Anthony Boyle (born 1950) is a professor of international law at the University of Illinois College of Law[1]. Boyle received a J.D. degree magna cum laude and A.M. and Ph.D. degrees in political science from Harvard University. He also practiced tax and international tax with Bingham, Dana & Gould.Amnesty International
As member of the board of Amnesty International USA at the end of the 1980s/early 1990s, He claimed that Amnesty International USA acted in ways closely related to United States and United Kingdom foreign policy interests. He stated that Amnesty, along with other human rights organisations in the US, failed to sufficiently criticise the Sabra and Shatila Massacre in Lebanon. Boyle stated his suspicion that the International Secretariat of Amnesty International, based geographically in London, UK, was also subject to this bias. He attributes the alleged links between Amnesty International and US and UK foreign policy interests to the relatively large financial contribution of Amnesty International USA to AI's international budget, which he estimated at 20%. Boyle also stated that Amnesty international was instrumental in publicizing the "Iraqi soldiers dumping children from incubators in Kuwait" hoax. Boyle also claimed that aspects of organisational continuity and survival came ahead of human rights aims in Amnesty International. He stated "Amnesty International is primarily motivated not by human rights but by publicity. Second comes money. Third comes getting more members. Fourth, internal turf battles. And then finally, human rights, genuine human rights concerns."
UNQUOTE
I suspect that Professor Boyle is a bore but he is not going to keep his mouth shut about things.
Errors & omissions, broken links,
cock ups, over-emphasis, malice [ real or imaginary ] or whatever; if
you find any I am open to comment. Updated on
10/05/2012 08:16
Email
me at Mike Emery. All
financial contributions are cheerfully accepted. If you want to keep
it private, use my PGP Key. Home
Page