News

News reports are an area where the BBC has its best chance to pretend that it unbiased and get away with it. It is also one of its greatest areas of bias. Anyone who watches their output at all knows about the Stephen Lawrence murder. It was a personal tragedy but the BBC went on about it far past the point where they could pretend that it was news rather than racist propaganda. Lawrence was black and  probably killed by Englishmen. That is what the BBC disliked. That is what the BBC used as stick to belabour us with. They want us to be ashamed of being English. Pushing the idea of Western Guilt is their big thing. They want blacks to feel as if they are victims. The BBC are racist liars. Of course when anyone English gets murdered or raped by blacks they choose to ignore it or pass on briskly to the football results.

To be fair all of the media were being racist over the Lawrence murder. None of them, with one honourable exception bothered to tell us the truth. The suspects were known to the police and the police were known to the suspects. That is how it is with career criminals. And when they know each other and trust each other - in the way that jackals trust each other, bribery becomes an option. Private Eye was the one told us about that.

The BBC's attitude changes briskly when it is one of their own. Jill Dando was murdered and that did matter  - according to the BBC. It was a waste. But the police felt the pressure and eventually they arrested a half wit who couldn't prove that he had an alibi months later [ Could you? ] and banged him up for life.

There is a simple test of BBC bias. When they tell you that Smith is right wing, wonder if they are being honest. If they tell you that Jones is left wing wonder if they are being honest. Then count the number of lefties who exist in the BBC's world view. The answer is not very many. They might accuse Green of being a right wing extremist but they will never say that anyone is a left wing extremist, not ever. Lenin, Joe, Mao, Pot and other thugs still have their little private  altars in BBC homes.

Then there is their enthusiasm for inciting homosexuality. They used Kenneth Williams as one of their front men and, to be fair, did it very well. I am not accusing the BBC of incompetence, far from it. They are too clever, too political, too effective.

Why is the BBC so deeply corrupt?  It was infiltrated over many years by men who had been the same universities and been influenced by the same left wing propagandists, by disciples of Antonio Gramsci, Michel Foucault, Louis Althusser, Jacques Derrida and various other cunning rogues. Now they control it.

What can we do about it? One answer is to complain about it. If we do nothing we are letting them get away with it. We can write letters to the complaints department and they will have to respond. How? Have a look at How to Complain and Who to Complain To. The other answer to bad television is to stop paying the television licence. That really brings the pains on. It is my answer but it is not for everyone. They threaten you. Their tone is the tone of arrogant bullies but can I laugh. I threw my television set away years ago. Vive la resistance.

News explained in pictures:-
fffff

 

Errors & omissions, broken links, cock ups, over-emphasis, malice [ real or imaginary ] or whatever; if you find any I am open to comment.

Email me at Mike Emery. All financial contributions are cheerfully accepted. If you want to keep it private, use my PGP KeyHome Page

Updated  on Wednesday, 27 August 2008 15:31:12