King Charles has made it to the throne after a long wait. Will he be a good King
or not? We will see; or at all events we will be told. The truth will come a bad
second to the agenda.
Tobias Langdon has written a major article on
Chuck the Cuck. You might get the impression that Mr Langdon does not
approve of our new King. It is perhaps fair to say that he is weak rather than
evil but the Establishment clustered round him
have life styles to keep up while the Zionist
crazies are vicious, driven by hate, paranoia and greed.
King Charles Will Be Proclaimed Monarch By The Accession Council
[ 10 September 2022 ] QUOTE King Charles will be officially proclaimed Britain's new monarch at a
meeting of the
Accession Council
at St James's Palace on Saturday, Buckingham Palace said. The 0900 GMT
Council meeting, which has two parts, proclaims the new sovereign and see
the King sign an oath to uphold the security of the Church in Scotland.
read more
The King Grants An Audience To His Prime Minister
[ 10 September 2022 ] His Majesty's Prime Minister is, of course
Liz Truss, recently
appointed by Elizabeth II. That is if he does
not decide to appoint someone else. This is highly unlikely. Following the meeting, there will be the Principal Proclamation at 1000 GMT
from the balcony overlooking Friary Court at St James's Palace, with other
announcements of the new monarch made UNQUOTE
His Coronation Oath comes later.
Are King And Country Worth Fighting For?
[ 9 February 2023 ]
QUOTE
WHO today would be willing to fight for King and Country? With the parlous
state Britain is in right now, I wouldn’t hazard a guess..................
However, it seems unlikely that students at most of our terrifyingly
woke-ridden universities would be rushing to the colours. Anyone even
mentioning such an idea these days would probably be immediately
deplatformed, cancelled, branded racist and fascist, and hounded out.
What about the wider public, the ordinary men and women of Britain?
Would they answer the call? Or, in an age of selfishness, cynicism and
indifference, engendered and epitomised by our craven politicians, are
they heartily sick of both King (with his coronation reportedly to be
based on themes of refugees, diversity and volunteering, followed by a
choir of refugees,
NHS staff and LGBTQ+ singers at Windsor Castle) and Country (no
longer recognisable as such)?
UNQUOTE
This sounds ominous. As Prince he wanted blacks in the Guards. It was
not a good sign. He has fallen for Left Wing
lies.
PS Would I serve if I had my time again? NO!
Chuck the Cuck The Shabbos-Goy Charles III Will Be A Worthy Successor to his Mother Elizabeth the Evil
[
Tobias Langdon ]
QUOTE
This article will be brought to you by the letter “M.” It will feature
meteor-malefactors, malign monarchs, and moral masturbation. First up:
meteor-malefactors. That’s the term I give to criminals whose serious
misdeeds flash through the media like a meteor before disappearing into
oblivion. Why does this happen? It’s very simple: because meteor-malefactors
reveal the toxic truth rather than reinforcing leftist lies. Let’s look at
two of the worst crimes ever committed on British soil. They involved the
prolonged suffering and exceptionally brutal murders of schoolchildren. And
they were inspired by two forms of hate that leftists pretend to take very,
very seriously: misogyny and racism.
Mary-Ann Leneghan and Kriss Donald, White victims of
non-White savagery But the murders of Mary-Ann Leneghan and Kriss Donald were forgotten long
ago by the leftist media. This might seem puzzling, when you consider, for
example, that Mary-Ann Leneghan was the victim of a gang of vilely
misogynistic men whose crimes were supremely horrible examples of
rape-culture and patriarchal barbarism:
[The surviving victim] described how she and Mary-Ann [Leneghan], her
friend of 10 years, had been abducted and forced into the boot of a car
as they sat in the car park of the Wallingford Arms in Reading,
Berkshire on May 6 last year [2005]. She said they were taken to Room 19
of Abbey House Hotel in the city where they were beaten with a metal
pole, ordered to strip, forced to perform oral sex, raped, and had
boiling sugared water thrown on them.
She said the pair were shown guns and a knife, constantly told they
were going to be killed and heard that they would be taken to Prospect
Park in Reading. During the first day she hardly flinched as she
recounted the graphic details without being hidden by a screen. But
today she wept as she told how, as she was raped by a man wearing white
jogging bottoms, another man said: “We are ready to go now, let’s leave
these bitches now, come on let’s do it.”
She told the jury that she understood this phrase to mean “the final
stage, that we were going to die, that they were going to kill us.” She
said she, together with Mary-Ann, was taken out of the boot of the car
and forced, stumbling and wiping blood from her head, across the park.
She said the pair had been ordered to kneel on the ground side by side
and were told to put pillow cases over their heads by two men, one
wearing a bandana over the lower half of his face and the man with the
white jogging bottoms.
With the six defendants just feet away Mary-Ann’s father sat with his
hand over the mouth as the girl continued. Asked by prosecutor Richard
Latham QC, what happened next she paused for around 30 seconds before
looking straight ahead at the jury and saying “she [Mary-Ann Leneghan]
was stabbed”. The court was told that the knife-man had been the man
with the bandana and asked where on Mary-Ann’s body the man had put the
knife she said: “Her upper body, her chest, her breasts, everything. She
was asking ‘please not there, please not there’ whatever area she was
referring to, and crying and pleading,” she said.
She told how the man with the bandana got angry saying words to the
effect of “shut up”. She said that Mary-Ann then fell in a ball on the
ground but the stabbing did not stop. “He got more angry because she
wouldn’t sit up, he was telling her to sit up because he wanted to slit
her throat. … He was stabbing and then she fell,” she said. “They said
something about wanting her to die slowly,” she added, before she broke
down in tears. … (Friend
weeps over Mary-Ann murder, The Daily Mail, 20th January
2006)
Rapists, torturers, murderers: the energetic enrichers who
killed Mary-Ann Leneghan
In 1993 an unlucky, mercifully quick and very unusual murder was
committed by a gang of “white racists” against an ugly Black schoolboy
called
Stephen Lawrence. Ever since then, the murder has been endlessly
revisited by leftists in articles, editorials, documentaries, dramas, and
academic studies. In 2018 the ugly shabbos shiksa Theresa May added
Stephen Lawrence Day to Britain’s official calendar. But the far worse
murder of Mary-Ann Leneghan — which was prolonged, premeditated and
viciously sadistic — was swiftly forgotten by leftists.
Why so? Well, her murder was perfect for the creation of a leftist
martyr-cult except for one thing: she and her rapist-murderers were the
wrong color. She was White and her rapist-murderers consisted of five Blacks
and one Albanian “asylum-seeker.” In other words, unlike the murder of
Stephen Lawrence, her murder couldn’t be used to promote the leftist lie
that villainous Whites are a constant threat to the lives and well-being of
virtuous non-Whites. On the contrary, it revealed the truth: that
non-Whites, and Blacks in particular, commit far more and far worse violence
against Whites than vice versa, even when those non-Whites are still far
fewer in number than Whites. That’s why the Black savages who tortured and
killed Mary-Ann Leneghan were meteor-malefactors. Their horrible crimes
flashed through the leftist media and then vanished forever.
Singh Something Simple
So did the horrible crimes of the Pakistani Muslim gang that kidnapped,
set on fire, and stabbed to death the fifteen-year-old
Scottish schoolboy Kriss Donald, who died for no other reason than that
he was White. It was another meteor-murder committed by more
meteor-malefactors, because it couldn’t be used to promote the leftist lie
of White villainy and non-White virtue. But criminals don’t have to commit
horrific crimes like those to be sent into oblivion by the left. Let’s move
from the sickening to the ridiculous and meet another meteor-malefactor: an
ethnic enricher called Jaswant Singh Chail. Luckily for the left, he didn’t
succeed in killing the elderly White woman he wanted to kill. If he had
succeeded, even the left wouldn’t have been able to send the murder into
speedy oblivion. This is because the elderly White woman in question was
called Queen Elizabeth II. On Christmas Day 2021, the bumbling and
incompetent Chail tried to enter Windsor Castle and
kill her with a crossbow. In a video he recorded beforehand, he
announced: “I will attempt to assassinate Elizabeth, Queen of the Royal
Family. This is revenge for those who have died in the 1919 Jallianwala Bagh
massacre. It is also revenge for those who have been killed, humiliated and
discriminated on because of their race.”
Jaswant Singh Chail, the wannabe anti-racist avenger and
assassin of Queen Elizabeth II
If Chail had succeeded in assassinating the Queen, the left might have
had to face some uncomfortable questions about the way it incites non-Whites
into violence against Whites with constant lying propaganda about “racism.”
He didn’t succeed and so the left turned him into a meteor-malefactor. But
then so did the cuckservative right, because Chail’s misdeeds also exposed
their lies. If he’d been a Muslim, I’m sure that conmen like
Mark Steyn and
Douglas Murray would have given a lot more publicity to what he tried to
do. But Chail is a Sikh, member of a so-called model minority, so he exposed
a truth that conmen and cuckservatives don’t want to face: that all
non-Whites are bad for the West. Yes, some groups are much worse than
others, but none of them should be here and all of them are being used by
the left and its Jewish generals in their war on the West.
Waging war on Whites
And in their war on the White working-class. Which brings me to some
interesting details in Chail’s farcical attempt on the Queen’s life:
He was spotted by a royal protection officer in a private section of
the castle grounds just after 08:10 GMT on 25 December 2021. The officer
was at a gate, leading to the monarch’s private apartments. Chail, who
was unemployed at the time but had worked for the Co-op supermarket, had
climbed into the grounds using a nylon rope ladder, and had already been
there for about two hours.
He was wearing a hood and a mask, and was described as “like
something out of a vigilante movie”. The officer took out his Taser, and
asked him: “Morning, can I help, mate?” Chail replied: “I am here to
kill the Queen.” The protection officer immediately told Chail to drop
the crossbow, get on his knees, and put his hands on his head. Chail
complied and then said again: “I am here to kill the Queen.” (Man
admits treason charge over Queen crossbow threat, BBC News, 3rd
February 2023)
The royal protection officer used the language of the White
working-class, probably because he is a member of the White working-class.
Either way, he and his comrades were no doubt very pleased with the cool and
professional way he responded to that threat to the monarch whom he had
sworn to serve and protect. But if the officer had truly understood the
political situation in Britain, he would have realized that his oaths had
been rendered null and void by the Queen’s own behavior. After Chail said,
“I am here to kill the Queen,” the officer should have said: “Be my guest,
mate” and then guided him to his target.
Assassination at the hands of a deranged non-White would have been no
more than Elizabeth II deserved for her decades-long betrayal of her people,
her nation, and her religion. As I pointed out in my article “Elizabeth
the Evil,” she was no great intellect but she played to perfection the
role of
Judas Goat, serving as a figurehead of false continuity and calm as
Britain was led into the slaughterhouse by Jews and leftists. She was a
malign monarch, betraying her coronation oaths as, decade after decade,
violent and destructive non-Whites with alien faiths flooded in to prey on
and parasitize her White subjects. Elizabeth II was a traitor, sitting
comfortably in luxurious palaces under 24-hour protection as White girls
were
raped by Muslims in Rotherham and elderly White women were
raped by a gerontophile Black in London. But those rapes, horrible as
they have been, constitute only a tiny fraction of the violence and misery
inflicted on Whites by non-Whites since the coronation of Elizabeth II in
1953.
War on Whites: how non-White savagery is concealed by the
Judeo-leftist media
Now Britain is preparing for the coronation of a new monarch and a new
traitor. He is officially known as Charles III, but I prefer to call him
Chuck the Cuck. Like his mother, he has lived in luxury, decade after
decade, and done nothing to defend his White subjects or Christianity
against the predation of non-Whites and their alien religions. Indeed, he’s
surpassed her in groveling allegiance to the ideology of minority worship
created and enforced by Jews. She was a shabbos shiksa and he is a shabbos
goy. As Israel Shahak pointed out in his fascinating (and disturbing) book
Jewish History,
Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years (1994), Jews
have traditionally followed a rule of unrelenting hostility and disdain
towards gentiles. But that rule is suspended in the case of kings and other
powerful figures who might be useful for Jews. And so Chuck the Cuck has
been showered with sycophancy by Britain’s Jews, but has been too stupid to
understand that it is self-serving, not sincere. He’s also been unable to
read the dire warnings of history. It is entirely possible that the
Jews who funded Oliver Cromwell were responsible for the execution of
Chuck the Cuck’s ancestor Charles I in 1649. It would have been Jewish
vengeance for their expulsion from England in 1290 by Edward I, who
favored
protecting his Christian subjects over pandering to gold-hungry Jews.
Chuck the Cuck is guided by Jews
Jews were certainly responsible for death of Chuck the Cuck’s relative
Tsar Nicholas II, who was
slaughtered with his wife and children by the Bolsheviks in 1918. The
Bolshevik government was dominated by Jews and the chief executioner of the
Romanov family was a
Jew called Yakov Yurosky. If Chuck the Cuck lost his power and
symbolical importance, he would soon see the genuine Jewish attitude towards
goyim. As it is, he basks in Jewish sycophancy and steadfastly follows an
anti-White Jewish agenda of minority-worship. Chuck the Cuck isn’t supposed
to interfere in politics, but he ignores that rule when he has narcissism to
feed and virtue to signal. The present Conservative government
has recently begun pretending that it is ready to get tough about the
endless flow of mostly young and mostly male migrants illegally crossing the
English Channel in small boats. This is how Chuck the Cuck has responded:
King Charles meets former refugees from Sudanese community
The King told former refugees who escaped by boat to Europe from the
Darfur genocide: “I’m so glad you’re safe here.” On Wednesday Charles
met accountants, NHS consultants and charity workers who have made a new
life in the UK. Sudanese activist Amouna Adam invited him to meet her
community when the pair met on Holocaust Memorial Day. […] The event,
organised by the Holocaust Memorial Day Trust and the human rights
organisation Waging Peace, was held at a central London venue used for
events by the UK’s Sudanese community. Addressing the men and women who
fled the mass killings, the King said: “It’s been a very special visit
for me, I can assure you. It’s been such a pleasure to meet you all —
I’m so glad you’re safe here.” (King
Charles meets former refugees from Sudanese community, BBC News,
15th March 2023)
Chuck the Cuck can be “glad” about Black Sudanese invading Britain
because he doesn’t have to pay the costs of their presence. That’s why I
hope to see him put on trial one day and face questions about an ordinary
White woman who has had to pay the cost of the Sudanese presence:
A savage from Sudan: the energetic enricher Zakarya Etarghi
‘Savage’ rapist Zakarya Etarghi has been given a life sentence with a
minimum of 18 years after shattering his victim’s skull and leaving her
for dead near a children’s play park. The 24-year-old attacked a woman
in her 50s at a public park in Leicester, East Midlands, after a cocaine
and alcohol binge.
Today he was jailed at Leicester Crown Court after being convicted of
rape and attempted murder on March 7. … Building-site worker Etarghi
attacked his ‘vulnerable’ victim and left her with horrific
life-changing injuries including a ‘shattered’ skull and bleeding to the
brain.
But a member of the public found her with head injuries at the park
following what prosecutor William Harbage QC previously told the jury
was a ‘brutal’ and ‘appalling’ assault. … Despite the evidence against
him, Etarghi, who was born in Sudan, denied the offences — saying
someone else must have carried out the attack.
Judge Nicholas Dean QC said his victim was ‘lucky to be alive’ after
being ‘attacked in a most brutal way’ when she met Etarghi in the
playground — with evidence suggesting a weapon of some kind had been
used. … The judge said he had ‘no hesitation’ in concluding Etarghi was
a ‘dangerous offender’ who was responsible for ‘controlled and extreme
brutality and physical violence of a most callous and horrifying type.’
The court heard a resident found her unconscious and naked from the
waist down at around 4.40am after the attack, suffering from multiple
injuries. She was rushed to hospital — [and] ‘miraculously’ survived
after undergoing life-saving surgery and is still recovering.
Thanks to non-White migration, many British Whites have undergone
experiences “like something out of a horror film.” Chuck the Cuck has
certainly heard about some of those experiences — the
rape-gangs in Rotherham and the
suicide-bombing in Manchester, for example — but it has made no
difference to his minority worship. Indeed, I can see a good parallel
between Chuck the Cuck and the Sudanese rapist Zakarya Etarghi. Both of them
are obviously dedicated to pursuing their own pleasure at no matter what the
cost to others. Etarghi committed rape and Chuck the Cuck commits what I’ll
call moral masturbation, that is, the self-pleasuring act of parading one’s
virtue and minority-worship in public. When Chuck the Cuck tells low-IQ
Sudanese that “I’m so glad you’re safe here,” he doesn’t care about the
ordinary Whites who will be harmed by their presence. After all, he wouldn’t
be rewarded with leftist acclaim and progressive kudos for defending the
interests of Whites. On the contrary, he would be condemned as a racist and
bigot for doing that. Defending Whites would take courage that he doesn’t
possess and inflict costs that he isn’t prepared to pay.
Crowning the Cuck
Chuck the Cuck will indulge in more moral masturbation during his
coronation. It’s already
been announced that he will “put refugees and the [ethnically enriched]
NHS [National Health Service] at the heart of a diverse Coronation that will
bring the nation together in a three-day celebration designed to reflect
modern, multi-cultural Britain.” Andrew Joyce
has explained how much harm non-Whites do to the NHS, but that makes no
difference to Chuck the Cuck. Now there are
even reports that the Church of England, no mean moral masturbators
themselves, are expressing doubts about the way he wants to involve other
religions in the coronation. I doubt that even Chuck the Cuck wants to be
crowned by the Chief Rabbi as a chorus of vulnerable asylum-seekers chant
“Allahu Akbar!” and wave the severed heads of assorted infidels. But he will
want something not far off. Like his mother, he is a dedicated traitor to
both the White British and to Christianity, the religion in which he was
baptized and that he has sworn to defend.
No Christianity, but some grinning paganism: Chuck the
Cuck’s coronation invitation with Green Man
And I wonder whether that betrayal of his religion is even worse than it
appears. There are no obvious Christian symbols on the invitations he has
issued for his coronation. But there is an obvious pagan symbol: the
Green Man at the
bottom. Is that a hint of where Chuck the Cuck’s real loyalties lie? That
is, is Chuck the Cuck not merely a shabbos-goy and traitor, but a literal
worshiper of evil? Whether he is or not, one thing is certain. Like the
reign of Elizabeth the Evil, the reign of Chuck the Cuck will be pleasing to
Satan, not to Jesus Christ.
UNQUOTE
Tobias Langdon puts a view; it is justified but it is not just our new King
but the
TPTB
= The Powers That Be. That boils down to Jews, to the
Zionist crazies.
